<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DiPot: Ice Tea tech &#187; Standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dipot.com/category/standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dipot.com</link>
	<description>The Optimization Point of View</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:15:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Microsoft IE and Standards Compliance</title>
		<link>http://dipot.com/2007/12/microsoft-ie-and-standards-compliance/</link>
		<comments>http://dipot.com/2007/12/microsoft-ie-and-standards-compliance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 08:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ageor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DiPot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DiPot.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opera Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is an indirect update to my December 16, 2007 &#8220;Web browser standards: Opera Software vs Microsoft&#8221; post in the &#8220;Internet Explorer 8 and Acid2: A Milestone&#8221; IEBlog post. The way I see it, Microsoft effectively confirms allegations about not complying with standards (by, at least, not seriously updating IE6 in over 5 years and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--:en-->There is an indirect update to my December 16, 2007 &#8220;<a href="http://blog.dipot.com/index.php/ice-tea-tech-blog/4-web-browser-standards-opera-software-vs-microsoft.html" target="_blank">Web browser standards: Opera Software vs Microsoft</a>&#8221; post in the &#8220;<a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2007/12/19/internet-explorer-8-and-acid2-a-milestone.aspx" target="_blank">Internet Explorer 8 and Acid2: A Milestone</a>&#8221; <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/default.aspx" target="_blank">IEBlog</a> post. The way I see it, Microsoft effectively confirms allegations about not complying with standards (by, at least, not seriously updating IE6 in over 5 years and creating lots of problems with IE7) promising it will do so with IE8:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230; <em>IE8 now renders the &#8220;Acid2 Face&#8221; correctly in IE8 standards mode.</em> &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230; <em>With respect to standards and interoperability, our goal in developing Internet Explorer 8 is to support the right set of standards with excellent implementations and do so without breaking the existing web. This second goal refers to the lessons we learned during IE 7. IE7&#8217;s CSS improvements made IE more compliant with some standards and less compatible with some sites on the web as they were coded. Many sites and developers have done special work to work well with IE6, mostly as a result of the evolution of the web and standards since 2001 and the level of support in the various versions of IE that pre-date many standards. We have a responsibility to respect the work that sites have already done to work with IE. We must deliver improved standards support and backwards compatibility so that IE8 (1) continues to work with the billions of pages on the web today that already work in IE6 and IE7 and (2) makes the development of the next billion pages, in an interoperable way, much easier.</em> &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>If you wonder who made the &#8220;existing web&#8221; prone to &#8220;breaking&#8221;, I don&#8217;t. In my mind, it was Microsoft. When IE was dominant, it never completely adhered to standards, while extending HTML in all sorts of ways. When standards emerged or caught up, was IE updated accordingly? No.</p>
<p>Is Microsoft finally entering a standards compliance era? How, by adding a &#8220;Standards mode&#8221; in IE8? I still have my doubts and for good reason. You see, past experience says otherwise.</p>
<p>Web developers, Microsoft hasn&#8217;t and won&#8217;t ever do it for you. If you are interested in every computer owner being able to fully utilize your sites, please do us all a favor and comply to universal, not Microsoft standards. Windows percentage in the PC market is still very large but dropping. Make them build a decent browser; or not, who cares? Firefox, Opera etc. are excellent, compliant and multiplatform browsers. Don&#8217;t build the Internet depended on ActiveX and anything else non-standard enough so only IE (therefore only Windows) users can view.<br />
<!--:--></p>
<!-- AdSense Now! V1.63 -->
<!-- Post[count: 2] -->
<div class="adsense adsense-leadout" style="float:right;margin: 12px;"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-1213643583738263";
/* 234x60, AdSenseNow created 3/1/09 */
google_ad_slot = "5294177075";
google_ad_width = 234;
google_ad_height = 60;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></div>
	<h4>Possibly related posts (auto generated)</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://dipot.com/2007/12/web-browser-standards-opera-software-vs-microsoft/" title="Web browser standards: Opera Software vs Microsoft (16/12/2007)">Web browser standards: Opera Software vs Microsoft</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://dipot.com/2009/04/wordpress-external-rss-feeds-optimization-with-kb-advanced-rss/" title="WordPress: External RSS Feeds Optimization with KB Advanced RSS (22/04/2009)">WordPress: External RSS Feeds Optimization with KB Advanced RSS</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://dipot.com/2009/01/optimize-firefox-with-91-must-have-add-ons/" title="<!--:en-->Optimize Firefox with 9+1 Must Have Add-ons <!--:--> (25/01/2009)"><!--:en-->Optimize Firefox with 9+1 Must Have Add-ons <!--:--></a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://dipot.com/2009/03/wordpress-optimization-compatibility-between-themes-plugins/" title="WordPress Optimization: Compatibility between Themes &#038; Plugins (27/03/2009)">WordPress Optimization: Compatibility between Themes &#038; Plugins</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://dipot.com/2007/12/your-home-on-camera-live/" title="<!--:en-->Your home on camera, live<!--:--> (18/12/2007)"><!--:en-->Your home on camera, live<!--:--></a> (0)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dipot.com/2007/12/microsoft-ie-and-standards-compliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Web browser standards: Opera Software vs Microsoft</title>
		<link>http://dipot.com/2007/12/web-browser-standards-opera-software-vs-microsoft/</link>
		<comments>http://dipot.com/2007/12/web-browser-standards-opera-software-vs-microsoft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 15:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ageor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opera Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#8217;t you just hate it when a web page won&#8217;t show correctly in Firefox or any non-Internet Explorer browser?
I have always wondered why any web developer would block all Linux &#38; Mac OS users out of their sites and frustrate a good portion of Windows users, those who prefer Firefox. On top of that, some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--:en-->Don&#8217;t you just hate it when a web page won&#8217;t show correctly in Firefox or any non-Internet Explorer browser?</p>
<p>I have always wondered why any web developer would block all Linux &amp; Mac OS users out of their sites and frustrate a good portion of Windows users, those who prefer Firefox. On top of that, some sites don&#8217;t even look the same in IE6 &amp; IE7 due to incompatibilities of their own, which recently forced Microsoft to decide to make IE7 available to illegal Windows owners as well!</p>
<p>Over time, it is a well-known fact that Microsoft won&#8217;t respect standards very much. Java has been a good example and HTML compliance is no different. So, what&#8217;s new about any of that? This extract from the Friday, December 14, 2007 8:00 AM PST Paul Meller and James Niccolai&#8217;s PC World article &#8220;<a title="Opera Seeks Tougher Remedy in Microsoft Case" href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,140573-c,internetexplorer/article.html">Opera Seeks Tougher Remedy in Microsoft Case</a>&#8220;, describing the &#8220;&#8230; <em>antitrust suit filed with the Commission this week</em> &#8230;&#8221; by browser maker Opera Software, which I find especially interesting and long overdue:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230; <em>In addition to the bundling charge, Opera also complains that Microsoft does not follow Web standards, putting rival browsers at a disadvantage. The issue is significant because if all Web browsers do not use the same standards, Web site developers are likely to design their Web sites to work with the most widely used browser, which is Internet Explorer. That gives people a disincentive to use other browsers.</em></p>
<p><em>Microsoft often takes part in debates over Web standards, and says it will implement them, but ultimately does not, Opera&#8217;s Lie said. He pointed to CSS, XHTML and DOM as areas where Microsoft does not comply with or is inconsistent.</em> &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I will follow up on this with great interest. I would prefer users and the industry to force Microsoft (and web developers) to comply by (prefferably open) standards (the cornerstone of the Internet), but a court might as well do it&#8230;<br />
<!--:--></p>

	<h4>Possibly related posts (auto generated)</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://dipot.com/2007/12/microsoft-ie-and-standards-compliance/" title="Microsoft IE and Standards Compliance (29/12/2007)">Microsoft IE and Standards Compliance</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://dipot.com/2009/01/optimize-firefox-with-91-must-have-add-ons/" title="<!--:en-->Optimize Firefox with 9+1 Must Have Add-ons <!--:--> (25/01/2009)"><!--:en-->Optimize Firefox with 9+1 Must Have Add-ons <!--:--></a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://dipot.com/2008/11/athens-startup-weekend-2008/" title="Athens Startup Weekend 2008 (26/11/2008)">Athens Startup Weekend 2008</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://dipot.com/2009/04/wordpress-external-rss-feeds-optimization-with-kb-advanced-rss/" title="WordPress: External RSS Feeds Optimization with KB Advanced RSS (22/04/2009)">WordPress: External RSS Feeds Optimization with KB Advanced RSS</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://dipot.com/2008/10/the-google-android-platform/" title="The Google Android Platform (20/10/2008)">The Google Android Platform</a> (0)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dipot.com/2007/12/web-browser-standards-opera-software-vs-microsoft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
