<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News Reading Thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dipot.com/2009/01/news-reading-thoughts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dipot.com/2009/01/news-reading-thoughts/</link>
	<description>The Optimization Point of View</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:29:12 +0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ageor</title>
		<link>http://dipot.com/2009/01/news-reading-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>ageor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 01:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your response and sorry for the delayed approval; the system considered this comment a spam.

If quantity is such that eventually posts end up not being parsed by the reader, duplication gives us another chance. Then again, extensive duplication results to such quantity; the chicken or the egg?

My preference is one searchable thread per subject and better parsing mechanisms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your response and sorry for the delayed approval; the system considered this comment a spam.</p>
<p>If quantity is such that eventually posts end up not being parsed by the reader, duplication gives us another chance. Then again, extensive duplication results to such quantity; the chicken or the egg?</p>
<p>My preference is one searchable thread per subject and better parsing mechanisms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Strategist</title>
		<link>http://dipot.com/2009/01/news-reading-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Strategist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Either a Social Networking site such as FriendFeed or a third party tool will eventually be developed to truly pull, filter, organize and store precisely what each reader desires. Until then we must make do with what is available. 

For many, duplication is a blessing rather than an obstacle to be avoided because it increases the likelihood that they will see the most valuable information posted. 

My number one desire would be the ability to organize and store material for reference at FriendFeed in a format easily accessible by subject so that it would be a resource for others as well as myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Either a Social Networking site such as FriendFeed or a third party tool will eventually be developed to truly pull, filter, organize and store precisely what each reader desires. Until then we must make do with what is available. </p>
<p>For many, duplication is a blessing rather than an obstacle to be avoided because it increases the likelihood that they will see the most valuable information posted. </p>
<p>My number one desire would be the ability to organize and store material for reference at FriendFeed in a format easily accessible by subject so that it would be a resource for others as well as myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
